Some Oregon Watershed Councils have been collecting macroinvertebrate
data for five years or more, and new analysis models can provide additional
interpretive and diagnostic information. However, to use these models,
Watershed Council data must be manipulated into an appropriate format.
Xerces staff are working with DEQ to translate data in the best way
to fit the model, and are working with three Watershed Councils to fit
their data into the models and interpret the outputs.
The Issue
Currently, more than a dozen Oregon Watershed Councils have monitoring
databases that, combined, include watershed specific data from hundreds
of macroinvertebrate monitoring sites. These Watershed Councils include
the McKenzie, Nehalem, Rogue, South Coast, Mid-Coast, Umpqua, Yamhill,
Upper Deschutes, Walla Walla, and several others. As valuable as such
macroinvertebrate monitoring coverage is, none of the data is in a format
that can be analyzed with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality's
(DEQ) recently completed, statewide River InVertebrate Prediction And
Classification System (RIVPACS) analysis model for Oregon. Once formatted
for the model, data can be used to identify potential stressors of biological
integrity and to enhance the TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) process.
This program will help watershed councils meet Oregon Plan monitoring
goals to document existing conditions, track changes, and determine
the impact of programs and actions.
The RIVPACS Model and TMDLs
DEQ's Water Quality Program's primary focus is the implementation of
federally mandated, basin-specific TMDLs (Total Maximum Daily Load).
This program has relied on traditional water-quality parameters such
as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and nutrients in the past. Recently,
the products of DEQ's biological monitoring efforts have gained acceptance
in the Water Quality Program as an important tool in the TMDL process.
The biological data are used at the beginning of the process to determine
if a waterbody is impaired and to identify specific stressors. During
the TMDL process, biological data can be used to determine the effectiveness
of the TMDL program by monitoring improvement in the water quality condition.
The analysis tool DEQ developed to determine impairment is a statewide
model based on the RIVPACS model developed in Great Britain in the mid-1980s.
The Oregon RIVPACS model uses several characteristics
of the sample site (including latitude and longitude, gradient, and
date sampled) to compare the site to a large database of reference or
least-disturbed sites. Once the relationship of the sample site to reference
conditions has been established, the model predicts an assemblage of
macroinvertebrates that should be present at the site in the absence
of impairment. The model then compares the assemblage that was actually
collected to the prediction, producing a biological condition score
and other output. Though the output is relatively easy to understand,
the model requires uploaded data to be in a very specific format, different
from that which has been produced by macroinvertebrate laboratories
in the past.
In addition to the RIVPACS model, DEQ staff has developed
a valuable stressor identification model that can diagnose whether temperature
or sedimentation are likely stressors, based on the organisms collected
at a site. Watershed Councils have expressed particular interest in
using the stressor identification models in their monitoring programs.
Need for Formatted Watershed Council Data
With the recent completion of the DEQ macroinvertebrate model, the Xerces
Society and DEQ have an opportunity to partner with watershed councils
to analyze their data using the RIVPACS model. In this project we will
work with three watershed councils that have expressed a need for this
analysis. The Nehalem River Watershed Councils have several years of
data that need to be interpreted using the model to satisfy obligations
to the DEQ. The McKenzie River Watershed Council also has several years
of data; they attempted to analyze some of their data using a draft
model produced at Utah State University, but the analysis was never
performed. In 2003, Walla Walla Basin Watershed Council and Xerces staff
discussed future applications of their data but did not have the opportunity
to further interpret the data. A letter of support for this grant proposal
from each Watershed Council partner has been attached.
Related Work
In a separate but related project, Xerces intends to work with the EPA
to provide taxonomic laboratories with RIVPACS-ready formats, eliminating
the need for formatting of future data by the Watershed Councils and
other users. However, there is a lot of existing data that needs to
be converted, which is why the EPA strongly supports this partnership
between OWEB, DEQ, Xerces, and Watershed Councils.